Health Nuts and Bolts

Cited: New York Times

Democrats and the AMA have been battling for a long time about protecting doctors from malpractice lawsuits.  According to Association officials, during a private meeting at the White House they may have found one Democrat willing to entertain the idea, President Obama.  It seems that Mr. Obama believes that reducing malpractice suits may help drive down health costs and should be considered part of the overhaul of healthcare according to the lawmakers of both parties and the AMA officials.  This is been a goal of many doctors and Republicans.

It is a position that could hurt Mr. Obama with the left wing of his party and with trial lawyers who are major donors to Democratic campaigns. But one Democrat close to the president said Mr. Obama, who wants health legislation to have broad support, views addressing medical liability issues as a “credibility builder” — in effect, a bargaining chip that might keep doctors and, more important, Republicans, at the negotiating table.

Mr. Obama went to the annual medical association meeting to face a group that has come out against a central component of his broader health care proposal — his call for a new public insurance program that would compete with the private plans. The White House says he will make the case that “reform is the single most important thing we can do for America’s long-term fiscal health,” and how important it is to have the cooperation of doctors.

But whether he can get them on board is an open question. The speech comes as the president’s ideas on health reform are facing mounting criticism — not only from the A.M.A. and Republicans, who also vehemently oppose a new public plan, but also from the hospital industry, which is up in arms over a proposal Mr. Obama announced on Saturday to pay for his health care overhaul in part by cutting certain hospital reimbursements.

Medical liability is an important component of the debate, but that, too, is controversial. White House officials said Mr. Obama was likely to refer to the issue in his speech to the medical association, but would not offer any specific proposal.

Mr. Obama has not endorsed capping malpractice jury awards, as did his predecessor, President George W. Bush. But as a senator, he advanced legislation aimed at reducing malpractice suits. And Dr. J. James Rohack, the incoming president of the medical association, said Mr. Obama told him at a meeting last month that he was open to offering some liability protection to doctors who follow standard guidelines for medical practice.

“If everyone is focused on saying, ‘How do we get rid of unnecessary costs,’ ” Dr. Rohack said, recounting the conversation, “if we as physicians are going to say, ‘Here’s our guidelines, we will follow them,’ then we need to have some protections. He listened and he said, ‘Clearly, that concept is worthy of discussion.’ ”

Health care experts estimate that preventable medical errors kill more than 100,000 Americans each year, yet doctors and hospitals, fearing lawsuits, do not openly discuss their mistakes — an impediment to improving quality of care. At the same time, doctors complain that “defensive medicine” — ordering tests and procedures out of fear of being sued — drives up health costs.

On Capitol Hill, Democrats drafting health legislation have so far shown little appetite for tackling the liability issue. But one Republican who met with Mr. Obama in April recalled that the president said he was willing to go against his party to get medical malpractice reforms into a health bill — but that he would expect Republican support for the legislation if he did so.

Mr. Obama also raised the issue at a recent meeting with two dozen Senate Democrats, some who attended said.

“He’s touched on this issue at a number of meetings,” said Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, who is also a proponent of liability reform. Mr. Wyden said the president articulated “the common sense message that if doctors act in line with their own professional guidelines, that ought to create a certain presumption that they have acted reasonably.”

As a senator, Mr. Obama joined Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2005 in proposing legislation aimed at reducing both medical errors and lawsuits through a program known as Sorry Works, rooted in the idea that injured patients value an apology as much as money. Their bill encouraged doctors and hospitals to investigate errors and apologize for mistakes, to facilitate what Mr. Obama described as “a reasonable settlement that keeps the case out of court.”

Although the A.M.A.’s highest legislative priority is capping jury awards, highly unlikely under the Obama administration, it does favor legislation like that proposed by Senators Obama and Clinton. Dr. Rohack said the group’s legislative experts were also working over the weekend to draft a bill that would set out a way to protect doctors who are sued if they have followed professional practice guidelines.

“We are supportive of anything that may reduce liability,” Dr. Rohack said, adding that he was heartened by Mr. Obama’s “recognition that defensive medicine contributes to unnecessary health costs.”

But to deliver a deal with doctors, Mr. Obama would probably have to defy senior members of his party in both houses of Congress. Many Democrats oppose putting limits on medical lawsuits because they believe it is ineffective and unfair to patients.

Senator Max Baucus of Montana, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, is expected to outline his proposal for a health care overhaul this week, and aides said liability protection for doctors is not part of the plan.

For those who are considering a lawsuit . . . A tragic injury can change your life and your family’s life difficult.  Your New York City car accidents lawyer should be dedicated to helping you recover the money you deserve to compensate you for your loss.  There approach, unlike larger firms, should be to be intimately familiar with your case.  Their firm should be a size that permits them to deliver high quality, detail-oriented legal services to their clients. This philosophy should resulted in an impressive record of maximizing recoveries for their clients.  Even if you need an NYC elder care attorney, they should be dedicated and detail orientated in their legal services to you.

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, resisted medical malpractice legislation when it was pushed by Republicans in the past. “The whole premise of a medical malpractice ‘crisis’ is unfounded,” Mr. Reid said on the Senate floor in 2006, in a speech that quoted extensively from a book titled “The Medical Malpractice Myth.”

And any effort to restrict patients’ legal rights to sue will face tough opposition from the American Association for Justice, which represents trial lawyers and has met with Nancy-Ann DeParle, Mr. Obama’s point person for health reform, to express its concerns. Linda Lipsen, the association’s chief lobbyist, said practice guidelines were established by unregulated medical societies and “should not be conclusive” in a court of law.

The association may have an ally in Mr. Obama’s health secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, who is a former director of the Kansas Trial Lawyers Association. But Mr. Obama’s first choice for health secretary, Tom Daschle, who advised the president throughout the campaign, was a strong proponent of linking evidence-based medicine with protections against lawsuits.  And another top health adviser to Mr. Obama, Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, has written extensively on liability reform.

“There is no doubt that comprehensive health care reform requires a monumental change to the current malpractice system, which not only hurts both doctors and patients, but also is far too expensive,” Dr. Emanuel, the brother of the White House chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, wrote in a 2008 book, “Healthcare Guaranteed: A Simple, Secure Solution for America.”

In March, Mr. Obama spoke to a group of chief executives and stated that malpractice law changes need to be part of the health care debate, he also conceded that it would not be an easy sale.  This is an indication that the solution may not be all that simple.

“Medical liability issues — I think all those things have to be on the table,” Mr. Obama said. “And I won’t lie to you that everybody agrees on this theoretically until you start getting into the specifics.”

____________________________________________

My Take: I believe they definitely need to do something about malpractice lawsuits against doctors.  Very few doctors do not have malpractice insurance.  Those that do have to charge more for their services, which means fewer patients.  This in turn, means that less people can get medical attention because they cannot afford.

There are many people who will suit a doctor over something trivial and they will win.  That means the malpractice insurance premium the doctor pays goes up and his fee goes up.  Many people do not realize that many doctors are in debt when they start their practice.  It takes thousands of dollars in school loans to get the education they need to become a doctor.  That means their fees are high to begin with and then they have to get malpractice insurance that costs an arm and a leg.

I can understand putting a cap on what someone can get in and malpractice suit.  There are so many things that need to be considered in doing that like what were the reasons that started the malpractice suit.  Is the patient alive?  Can the patient still work?  If a patient is still alive and is still able to work, they should not get as much as someone who sues because a family member is dead or the patient is permanently disabled.

There are even some people who believe that if a doctor caused a patient’s death because of a medical error, that the doctor should face criminal charges.  Maybe this is one of the options in this big discussion.  A doctor needs to trust the patient to do their job.  This is why many doctors and hospitals do not say anything when they discover a medical error.  They do their best to correct that error if at all possible.  However, sometimes that error cannot be corrected and this is the main issue in a malpractice suit.

______________________________________________

Other Resources

Employment Problems

If you are having problems with your employer, you need a NY Long Island harassment lawyer with growing, aggressive law firm that focuses on protecting the rights of individuals at the place they spend the majority of their days and nights – the workplace.  A law firm specializing in enforcing the rights of employees in an effort to preserve a fair, equal and just employment environment.  A New York harassment lawyer with a firm that has significant experience representing plaintiffs in all phases of litigation in all forums including New York State and federal courts, arbitration, and before both state and federal administrative agencies.

Family Lawyers

If you are looking for a fair, competent and tough New Jersey family lawyer, in Bergen or Passaic Counties, whether you are just contemplating divorce or separation, or have already been divorced and need post judgment relief for child custody, child support, emancipation, or for the modification of a pre-existing award of alimony or even a NJ equitable distribution lawyer set up a consultation.  An attorney is conveniently located near the Bergen County Courthouse in Hackensack, New Jersey.

Court Reporting Services

For real-time court reporting, deposition services, litigation support, trial reporting, arbitration reporting, and audio/video reporting you need a good LA court reporter. Using e-transcript technology, a good service can provide with every transcript a program on disk to format and print condensed transcripts, indices, cut and paste capability, saving of transcript in various litigation formats, ability to e-mail condensed transcript, index, and/or full-sized transcript to consultants or other parties.  With the right service you can get from in-house color copying of exhibits to document imaging to video editing to synchronizing video and text to software recommendations and training, the service would provide full litigation support services including disposition reporters Los Angeles.